Originally reported byLuca Geretti (Bitbucket: lgeretti, GitHub: lgeretti)
For the laser example, provide the actual values of the ratio between the zi value on the critical x0 and the zi value on a point far for the edge, for different values of Tscan. This will prove that higher periods yield better ratios (i.e., closer to 1 instead of higher than 1) and are preferable.
Original comment byLuca Geretti (Bitbucket: lgeretti, GitHub: lgeretti)
The data is sufficient: will give qualitative information about the fact that larger periods are preferable, hence we focus on the largest period that avoids carbonization.
Original comment byLuca Geretti (Bitbucket: lgeretti, GitHub: lgeretti)
There is a very large overshoot at high periods, which becomes a bit reasonable for example at 20 ms, at +16%. The overshoot at 186 ms is around 0.5% instead.
lgeretti
commented
8 years ago
Originally reported by Luca Geretti (Bitbucket: lgeretti, GitHub: lgeretti)
For the laser example, provide the actual values of the ratio between the zi value on the critical x0 and the zi value on a point far for the edge, for different values of Tscan. This will prove that higher periods yield better ratios (i.e., closer to 1 instead of higher than 1) and are preferable.