search

ariesteam / aries

http://www.ariesonline.org
GNU General Public License v3.0
6 stars 1 forks source link

can we close issues 13 & 14? #45

Closed kbagstad closed 12 years ago

kbagstad commented 12 years ago

These have morphed into huge exchanges between Gary and Ferd. Can you review and close if appropriate? As I'm sure Gary would say, a proper issue tracking system needs to be kept up to date...

kbagstad commented 12 years ago

@fvilla, @lambdatronic

lambdatronic commented 12 years ago

Issue 13 looks like it was addressed already by adding the thinklab.ordering sequences to one of those whacky *.properties files. This might have only been a bandaid though, since Ferd pointed out that this was probably something wrong in the ontologies. His suggestion was that we perform a thorough ontology review, update, and cleaning. I am, as you probably suspect, all in favor of this. It is a much needed and long overdue quality control procedure. However, much like our recent data review, update, and cleaning, this is a lot of work and probably falls predominantly to Ken. For now, I suspect you can simply close issue 13 and create a new issue requesting a thorough updating of the ontologies.

For issue 14, I closed it since there haven't been any further reports of weird NetCDF writing issues in the same vein as those reported in that issue. If you run into any new ones, feel free to open a new issue as usual.

As a final note, it looks like the GitHub issue tracker has finally gotten over it's silly messaging bug AFAICT. So from now on, when making issues please stick the @foo tags in the original issue body and not in a separate comment.

Thanks, ~Gary