Open mw66 opened 3 years ago
I just found the work around how to make the pyd call:
auto h = c.__hash__()();
I think here we should use the python convention:
c.__hash__; // return the method-wrapper
c.__hash__(); // return the result of the function call.
Ah, yeah, that's kind of annoying. I would certainly like it if I could get D to do as you suggest, but there is no way (or wasn't last time I checked, admittedly a while) to get opDispatch to distinguish between obj.property
and obj.property()
. So we have this kind of compromise where no parameters are treated as obj.property
and presence of parameters are treated as a method call.
OK, I added the work-around, so new user can follow the example to make the call.
@ariovistus: I'm a git idiot, I tried to add python39 support (which I have been used for a year without problem on my local machine), but I messed up my PR and my local branches.
It should be just a single file PR (commit hash 170ac4b) for dub.json:
https://github.com/ariovistus/pyd/pull/143/commits/170ac4b2094de249c8588a3cafd59ab6bfafc64f
If you have time, can you separate this file as a single PR and merge it, then we can have python39 support.
Thanks.
done
This is a bug report actually:
however, pyd output: