Open afischer1-godaddy opened 1 year ago
This issue is stale because it has been open 90 days with no activity. The issue will be reviewed by a maintainer and may be closed
+1
This issue is stale because it has been open 90 days with no activity. The issue will be reviewed by a maintainer and may be closed
Enhancement summary
Currently there is only the option to use an RFC5549 based IPv6 only underlay OR an IPv4 only underlay. Both address families together as dualstack (IPv4+IPv6) underlay is not natively supported as of now.
Which component of AVD is impacted
eos_designs
Use case example
Many DCs started with an access-distribution-core setup and a single routing table which is fine for a small environment but hit scale limits when growing. For uplifting such networks to modern design but sticking with the single routing table (with IPv4+IPv6) without any VRFs the option for a dual stack underlay would come in handy.
Describe the solution you would like
With the following set I would expect both IPv4 and IPv6 underlay to be present in the config:
This would result in interface config with IPv4 and IPv6 addresses + BGP sessions for IPv4 and IPv6 carrying only their address families prefixes. This does not involve any overlays.
Describe alternatives you have considered
Before trying to mess with
uplink_structured_config
andcustom_structured_configuration
using a single overlay comes to mind but would make it a more than necessary complex setup.Additional context
No response
Contributing Guide