Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago
Original comment by jamie.l...@gmail.com
on 18 Nov 2013 at 1:39
Hello,
What tool did you acquire memory with?
Original comment by atc...@gmail.com
on 18 Nov 2013 at 11:27
Something like jtag debugger.
Original comment by vitaly.v...@gmail.com
on 19 Nov 2013 at 8:23
Hello,
Would it be possible to send the memory sample you acquired or is it senstive?
I can give you credentials to a private FTP server only used by the developers,
it would not be made public.
Original comment by atc...@gmail.com
on 25 Nov 2013 at 6:34
It's under strict NDA. So all what I can - try patches from you and send debug
logs back.
Original comment by vitaly.v...@gmail.com
on 26 Nov 2013 at 8:14
Andrew, can you provide an update on this issue? Are there some patches you can
send Vitaly to help debug?
Original comment by michael.hale@gmail.com
on 7 Mar 2014 at 5:23
Hello Vitaly,
Do you know if there is public documentation of how the jtag interface is
acquiring RAM? I read about trace32 and it seems to run against live systems.
From looking at the output of -dd it shows that the ARM profile is selected,
but then pslist falls apart. This means that the initial (static) translation
is correct, but the dynamic ones are not.
I have a feeling the memory dump is in a format that does not pad output so
that the offsets retrieved from address tralsnation are wrong. On the live
system could you run 'cat /proc/iomem' and paste the output here (or email to
me if its sensitive)? This will help me figure out how RAM is laid out in
physical memory.
Original comment by atc...@gmail.com
on 9 Mar 2014 at 10:39
Hello
I will do it some time late
Original comment by vitaly.v...@gmail.com
on 11 Mar 2014 at 9:35
Hi Vitaly,
You can get Andrew's email from the tracker (its just atcuno [at] gmail.com)
and mine is michael [dot] hale @ gmail.com. Feel free to shoot us an email when
you get a chance to run cat /proc/iomem and we can help you troubleshoot
through the issue. I'll close the issue here, because it sounds like some info
shouldn't be discussed publicly. Thanks!
Original comment by michael.hale@gmail.com
on 13 Mar 2014 at 3:48
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
vitaly.v...@gmail.com
on 15 Nov 2013 at 4:30Attachments: