Apparently Fedora decided to remove libopenaptx and include a fork, libfreeaptx instead.
libfreeaptx 0.1.0 was a fork of libopenaptx 0.2.0.
Sadly from a programmer's or a packager's view, the package version and the file names were deliberately changed. Otherwise, the library is the same.
Would it be viable to add --with-libfreeaptx, with appropriate adjustments to the code, of course?
As to why this happened, there is some discussion here and it can be researched further from there. I did not go into the details and have no opinion on the matter...
Apparently Fedora decided to remove libopenaptx and include a fork, libfreeaptx instead.
libfreeaptx 0.1.0 was a fork of libopenaptx 0.2.0.
Sadly from a programmer's or a packager's view, the package version and the file names were deliberately changed. Otherwise, the library is the same.
Would it be viable to add --with-libfreeaptx, with appropriate adjustments to the code, of course?
As to why this happened, there is some discussion here and it can be researched further from there. I did not go into the details and have no opinion on the matter...