Closed mmagician closed 1 year ago
Just to check: is the pairing equivalent or not? --- latter would be breaking.
The pairing's equivalent. But you bring up a good point - the parameters for the Miller loop need to be adjusted, so maybe the ec
change should be considered as a breaking change?
This would only be breaking if someone had their own implementation of another bw6 curve and was already using arkworks 0.4+. In the end, we should probably stick to best practices though.
If the pairing is equivalent, then I think it would be completely okay---we do this, but just leave a changelog entry that the parameters have been changed.
^ and in this case, ec
change should surely be a breaking change.
I believe we can merge this one first and then see if the test in the algebra passes.
@mmagician Let's merge this once the parameters are updated.
I temporarily switched to a branch bw6-optimization
from algebra - this should allow us to verify that all tests are indeed passing, and once this PR is merged, we can also merge https://github.com/arkworks-rs/algebra/pull/617, and finally update the patch.
Description
Companion to https://github.com/arkworks-rs/algebra/pull/617
Before we can merge this PR, please make sure that all the following items have been checked off. If any of the checklist items are not applicable, please leave them but write a little note why.
Pending
section inCHANGELOG.md
Files changed
in the Github PR explorer