Closed Fourdee closed 7 years ago
If you started providing DietPi for H3 boards based on mainline kernel, you'll encounter tons of small inconsistencies like this. And this is exactly the reason why there are only nightly Armbian images with mainline kernel for H3 boards (and only for several of them).
[ 8.464810] of: dev_pm_opp_of_cpumask_add_table: couldn't find opp table for cpu:0, -19
[ 8.464859] cpu cpu0: dev_pm_opp_get_opp_count: OPP table not found (-19)
suggests that DT for NanoPi Neo is missing CPU operating points.
For the record, NanoPi Neo is currently using Device Tree for the OrangePi One, and NanoPi Air is using DT for the NanoPi Neo 😄
@zador-blood-stained
If you started providing DietPi for H3 boards based on mainline kernel, you'll encounter tons of small inconsistencies like this. And this is exactly the reason why there are only nightly Armbian images with mainline kernel for H3 boards (and only for several of them).
Yep, i'am considering it for some devices, but each device will need to be thoroughly tested before we consider replacing 3.x images.
For the record, NanoPi Neo is currently using Device Tree for the OrangePi One, and NanoPi Air is using DT for the NanoPi Neo
The strange thing is, the NanoPi Neo with 4.9 seems alot more stable than 3.x at the moment lol. USB WiFi was non-functional on 3.x: https://github.com/Fourdee/DietPi/issues/667. Seems to be working great on 4.9.
The other reason for 4.9 is for working brcm
module (as per FriendlyARM's image) instead of dhd
for NanoPi Neo Air: https://github.com/Fourdee/DietPi/issues/640
Has this also been changed for 3.x? https://github.com/igorpecovnik/lib/commit/8f4e8e25e425169c90d12c67d21e5b84f5cdb231
USB WiFi was non-functional on 3.x: Fourdee/DietPi#667. Seems to be working great on 4.9.
Not a surprise. 8192cu is out of tree for 3.x kernels, and it's possible that firmware is needed (not in the case you linked). Also kernel upgrade will break it since DKMS is not supported at the moment. While in mainline a good enough driver is present in the kernel source to start with and it will work out of the box if you have correct firmware installed.
The other reason for 4.9 is for working brcm module (as per FriendlyARM's image) instead of dhd for NanoPi Neo Air: Fourdee/DietPi#640 Has this also been changed for 3.x? 8f4e8e2
Sorry, don't have Neo or Neo Air, so can't test or change anything (that requires testing) related to these boards.
For the record, NanoPi Neo is currently using Device Tree for the OrangePi One, and NanoPi Air is using DT for the NanoPi Neo
Ah yes, air .dtb
isnt available yet, or shared with Neo?:
/boot/dtb-4.9.0-sun8i/sun8i-h3-nanopi-neo.dtb
/boot/dtb/sun8i-h3-nanopi-neo.dtb
Was worth a shot, but as expected, no WiFi :
cp /boot/dtb/sun8i-h3-orangepi-one.dtb /boot/dtb/sun8i-h3-nanopi-neo.dtb
cp /boot/dtb-4.9.0-sun8i/sun8i-h3-orangepi-one.dtb /boot/dtb-4.9.0-sun8i/sun8i-h3-nanopi-neo.dtb
@zador-blood-stained
suggests that DT for NanoPi Neo is missing CPU operating points.
.dtb
are binary, where are they generated in ARMbian source code (if at all)? Thinking we could simply copy the orangepi-one.dtb
cpu vars into the nanopi-neo.dtb
?
Ah yes, air .dtb isnt available yet, or shared with Neo?
Don't think Air DTB is avaliable, but this patch adds wireless to the Neo DT.
.dtb are binary, where are they generated in ARMbian source code (if at all)? Thinking we could simply copy the orangepi-one.dtb cpu vars into the nanopi-neo.dtb ?
They are generated at kernel compilation time, so you need to create a kernel patch to add DVFS specific bits and modify u-boot patch to load respective DT for Neo and Air.
@Fourdee
I updated the patches in d5b51f6a. Please check if DVFS works for Neo and Neo Air.
@zador-blood-stained
I updated the patches in d5b51f6. Please check if DVFS works for Neo and Neo Air.
Legend 👍 Thanks again 😃
Will test and report back.
@zador-blood-stained
Checked Air. Works a treat, thanks 👍
root@nanopiair:~# cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_governor
schedutil
root@nanopiair:~# cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_available_governors
conservative ondemand userspace powersave performance schedutil
root@nanopiair:~# cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/stats/time_in_state
120000 0
240000 4732
312000 1276
480000 850
624000 850
816000 867
1008000 15405
Ondemand:
root@DietPi:~# cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/stats/time_in_state
120000 450
240000 521
312000 179
480000 80
624000 0
816000 0
1008000 10880
No CPUfreq/gov information available: https://github.com/Fourdee/DietPi/issues/640#issuecomment-269232618
Tested with NanoPi Neo (not air) and 4.9, thats fine: