I was confused when I looked at the changelog and saw the out-of-order dates, but I looked into the change described and realized it was simply using a YYYY-DD-MM date format instead of the ISO 8601 YYYY-MM-DD format used by the rest of the changelog.
I was confused when I looked at the changelog and saw the out-of-order dates, but I looked into the change described and realized it was simply using a YYYY-DD-MM date format instead of the ISO 8601 YYYY-MM-DD format used by the rest of the changelog.