armindoantunes / gh615

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/gh615
0 stars 0 forks source link

Ask first then download #22

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
Hello
Here are some UI improvements...

I have moved around the question for "b" (and the new "c?") to be asked
before the big data transfer, I think it is nice to do the question and
then fire away the "long" jobs...

I also got tired of having to do "a" to get a list of tracks before "b" so
"b" now starts with fetching the list as it quite a fast operation and UI
wise it is nice to have the list when one should select tracs...

I have also added a "c?" to act as "c" but you can select output format, I
don't know if you want to replace "c" with the select format version so I
created a new as an example.

I added some info on how to config serialport under Linux (why do you use
56000 and not 57600? )

The diff is against rev 164

Original issue reported on code.google.com by ZingoAnd...@gmail.com on 31 Aug 2008 at 3:31

Attachments:

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
I liked the "?"-syntax you introduced and so I added most of your suggestions 
in 
r166 like so:

c: calling it without args assumes gpx
c?: prompts you for the format
c fitlog: uses the format you supply, asuming it exists

b: asks for trackIds, prompts for format, then executes
b?: lists tracks, asks for ids, prompts for format, then executes

Original comment by spei...@gmail.com on 31 Aug 2008 at 7:08

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago

Original comment by spei...@gmail.com on 31 Aug 2008 at 7:12

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
I think it is better if ? could mean the same thing like in c? it means I want 
to
select output format but in b? it means I wan to see list of tracks...

I think it would be nicer if b? also ment select output format and b defults to 
gpx 
Are there any reason why one don't want the list of tracks almost always?

Original comment by ZingoAnd...@gmail.com on 31 Aug 2008 at 10:12

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
How about this change, it makes it possible to specify the default output 
format, and
it makes b,b?,b <format> behave like c,c? and c <format>

Original comment by ZingoAnd...@gmail.com on 31 Aug 2008 at 11:11

Attachments:

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
I don't know if you still want the track-list optional in b the latest patch 
makes it
always appare in b again.

(I didn't think you where sill working on it tonight so the patch is not from 
you
latest let me know if I should rebase)

Original comment by ZingoAnd...@gmail.com on 31 Aug 2008 at 11:15

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
sorry the patch is against r166 (I saw you closing 21 and assumed you commited 
it
also) e.g. it was from your latest and a fix from the string in issue 21 and 20.

Original comment by ZingoAnd...@gmail.com on 1 Sep 2008 at 6:54

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
Works greate I have also tried the latest firmware now.
Thanx for the help! and keep up the good work.

Original comment by ZingoAnd...@gmail.com on 1 Sep 2008 at 6:16

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
no, thank you for your suggestions!
tracklist is now always shown when doing b, except when suppressing with "b!".
"b!" is a good call when getting tracks with the newly added slice notation: 
just 
enter "-1" instead of a trackid to get the newest track or "-5:" to get the 
five 
newest or "4:5" to get tracks #4 and #5. I like it, maybe you will too.

Original comment by spei...@gmail.com on 1 Sep 2008 at 8:08

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago

Original comment by spei...@gmail.com on 2 Sep 2008 at 10:10