Closed jceb closed 4 years ago
IMO the impress.js integration right now is quite okay (even better than some other impress.js generators), so I am interested in its shortcomings: Could you elaborate on the "not up to par" part a bit?
But for the second part of your issue: copying both frameworks in the output is nonsense, of course, and will be fixed in the next couple of days...
I guess I was misled regarding the impressjs integration. My feeling was that it's something more on the side rather that a serious attempt. You can ignore that part and focus on the framework duplication issue :-D
I'd actually find it really cool if everything, images, styling, framework and presentation could be compressed into a single html file that can be copied on a stick or a webserver to be presented to an audience. .. Might be worth another issue :-D
Do you have problems with the standalone
exporter of markdeck?
I haven't tried it yet. How does it work?
In the header section of slides.md
, define
standalone: markdeck-example.html
that should generate named file in the deck folder.
(beware, dragons here, aka alpha-status)
My impression is that the impress.js integration is not up to par with the revealjs integration yet. Furthermore, currently both frameworks are put in the output folder which makes the is unnecessarily big. In order to deliver a great experience I suggest to remove the impress.js integration.