search

arpa2 / tlspool

TLS daemon with PKCS #11 backend
Other
6 stars 7 forks source link

choose between 1.0 or 2.0 #96

Closed vanrein closed 5 years ago

vanrein commented 5 years ago

We have labeling for _V2 in the API, so it might make more sense to use that in the numbering too. We never formally released _V1 on GitHub, but the version has existed. The API numbering makes sense as a basis for semantic versioning.

vanrein commented 5 years ago

There has been a V1, though it was mostly internal, but the TLS Pool has been quite stable for a while anyway. And I've seen plenty of confusion with differences in numbering -1. Let's not do that.

The next version will be 2.0 to reflect the V2 API. After that, we shall bump the serial (only) when a new API is defined.

FWIW, V2 has been around a while. But we are not making statements about older things.