Following up on the issue #9, here is a proposition that might be good for other ADCTouchSensor users who would want to try the STM32duino (it's supported by ST so they have a lot of new architectures).
There is no default option for ADCTOUCH_DIVIDER, so another even more inclusive option could be to use #else instead of my proposed #elif defined(ARDUINO_ARCH_STM32) (see here).
Let me know if you prefer this 2nd option?
...or if there is anything I could do to make this pull request better?
Hi @arpruss!
Following up on the issue #9, here is a proposition that might be good for other ADCTouchSensor users who would want to try the STM32duino (it's supported by ST so they have a lot of new architectures).
There is no default option for
ADCTOUCH_DIVIDER, so another even more inclusive option could be to use#elseinstead of my proposed#elif defined(ARDUINO_ARCH_STM32)(see here).Let me know if you prefer this 2nd option?
...or if there is anything I could do to make this pull request better?
Thanks again for this great lib! Cedric :)
PS: It seems that Roger Clark suggests to use the stm32duino core now: https://github.com/rogerclarkmelbourne/Arduino_STM32#background--support