Closed brentp closed 13 years ago
closing as this is addressed by groupBy in filo: http://obx.cphg.virginia.edu/quinlan/?p=208
aaron, in your post, then 2nd groupBy command is the same as the first, i think it should end in -concat, no?
riiiight. sorry!
when annotating large regions, it's common to have multiple genes with 0 distance. those get created as multiple lines in the output. it would be nice to be able to get all of them on the same line with a boolean flag like --collapse.
then instead of:
chr10 62635514 62636138 chr10:62633793-62636189 2.932e-07 18 chr10 62634711 62634800 uc009xpd.2 0 - 714 chr10 62635514 62636138 chr10:62633793-62636189 2.932e-07 18 chr10 62634711 62634800 uc001jli.2 0 - 714 chr10 62635514 62636138 chr10:62633793-62636189 2.932e-07 18 chr10 62634711 62634800 uc001jlh.2 0 - 714
it would give:
chr10 62635514 62636138 chr10:62633793-62636189 2.932e-07 18 chr10 62634711 62634800 uc009xpd.2,uc001jli.2,uc001jlh.2