Open arkyl opened 5 years ago
How were the samples aligned?
On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 11:20 AM ylark notifications@github.com wrote:
Hi, The lumpy result for my input bam didn't have SR support, i.e. all are SR=0. The bam did have the SA tag. I am wondering what might be the issue. Thanks a lot!
The lumpy command line is : lumpyexpress -B input.bam -o lumpy.vcf -x exclude_bed
Yue
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/arq5x/lumpy-sv/issues/274, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAlDUaWovbkhVox3m_RXeeDSf25kJ2U5ks5uhPHQgaJpZM4XGfb_ .
it was aligned by Sentieon pipeline, which used bwa mem aligner and then a gatk like postprocess (mark duplicate, realign indel).
an example line:
A00364:9:H3MWMDSXX:2:2551:7229:29606 355 chr1 1577876 60 42M108H chr13 103355267 0 GCCAGTTCTGGGTGGAGTCTGCCGTCCAGAATGAGATTTATG FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF NM:i:0 MD:Z:42 AS:i:42 XS:i:22 RG:Z:NA12878_S10_001_1 SA:Z:chr13,103355244,+,42S108M,60,0;
Thanks.
Does your splitter file have anything in it?
On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 1:43 PM ylark notifications@github.com wrote:
it was aligned by Sentieon pipeline, which used bwa mem aligner and then a gatk like postprocess (mark duplicate, realign indel).
an example line: A00364:9:H3MWMDSXX:2:2551:7229:29606 355 chr1 1577876 60 42M108H chr13 103355267 0 GCCAGTTCTGGGTGGAGTCTGCCGTCCAGAATGAGATTTATG FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF NM:i:0 MD:Z:42 AS:i:42 XS:i:22 RG:Z:NA12878_S10_001_1 SA:Z:chr13,103355244,+,42S108M,60,0;
Thanks.
— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/arq5x/lumpy-sv/issues/274#issuecomment-426773311, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAlDUVFYPScBsN-qogUjCnXP5XkAqiR5ks5uhRNqgaJpZM4XGfb_ .
I used lumpyexpress: lumpyexpress -B input.bam -o lumpy.vcf -x exclude_bed
And I didn't see intermediate files.
Pass "-k" to keep the temp files, from there we can dig in.
On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 2:16 PM ylark notifications@github.com wrote:
I used lumpyexpress: lumpyexpress -B input.bam -o lumpy.vcf -x exclude_bed
And I didn't see intermediate files.
— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/arq5x/lumpy-sv/issues/274#issuecomment-426785593, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAlDUYxa2X6bB9bwocKrH9OUjOOAr9VAks5uhRskgaJpZM4XGfb_ .
Hi Ryan, I used the -k parameter in lumpyexpress. But the output is only the final vcf. It didn't seem to keep the temp files.
~/software_installed/lumpy-sv/scripts/lumpyexpress -B ../NA12878_S10_R1_001.bam.chr22.bam -o NA12878_S10_R1_001.bam.chr22.bam.dash-k.vcf -k &
Thank, Yue
That is strange. Why don't you give https://github.com/brentp/smoove a try. We have made many fixes to the extraction process that should help.
On Fri, Oct 5, 2018 at 9:00 AM ylark notifications@github.com wrote:
Hi Ryan, I used the -k parameter in lumpyexpress. But the output is only the final vcf. It didn't seem to keep the temp files.
~/software_installed/lumpy-sv/scripts/lumpyexpress -B ../NA12878_S10_R1_001.bam.chr22.bam -o NA12878_S10_R1_001.bam.chr22.bam.dash-k.vcf -k &
Thank, Yue
— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/arq5x/lumpy-sv/issues/274#issuecomment-427395631, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAlDURjzKsOMyx0qmh5mrocUtj_xdCy-ks5uh3P8gaJpZM4XGfb_ .
Thanks much. I will try smoove.
Hi, The lumpy result for my input bam didn't have SR support, i.e. all are SR=0. The bam did have the SA tag. I am wondering what might be the issue. Thanks a lot!
The lumpy command line is : lumpyexpress -B input.bam -o lumpy.vcf -x exclude_bed
Yue