Open mdshw5 opened 10 years ago
Will do so once I have some data that I am allowed to share.
+1 to this one. I may be able to add some shotgun metagenomic data in the near future, but not how sure that will be for instructional purposes.
Just in case it wasn't obvious, this was only partially a joke issue.
must be dense - what's the joke? that minion/nanopore sequencing would be vaporware? not sure what MAP agreements look like, but as soon as i've confirmed i can release data i'll put some here.
I will put some up, probably a full run will need to be hosted outside this repo though, as the files are quite large.
"Full run" and "fix this" urgency were in jest. Seriously though, just part of a run would be fine for tool test data.
+1 would love to see what it looks like
Looks like @nickloman released some yesterday so maybe it could be linked from here?
We could take a subset of these reads to serve for the basis of our test suite.
I think that is a solid plan, but we want to either keep it very lightweight so that cloning the repo is easy, or we could have a test_data
command that just downloads a more informaticve subset from Amazon S3. Or both.
It looks like there is no testing framework in poretools currently, so maybe once there is it could be split:
Yep @mdshw5 - that is the way to go. We'll get there. Nick and I are both in crunch meeting and grant deadline time, but after the dust settles, we will take care of it.
+1 to this! Need some test data for a homebrew-science formula I've been working on anyway, so will try kill 2 birds with one stone :smile:
See https://github.com/Homebrew/homebrew-science/pull/2300.
UPDATE: I've added some test data to the homebrew poretools package. Will write some tests for this in due course.
Matt Loose has some data from his Read Until paper: https://github.com/mattloose/RUscripts . Seems pretty small and all the scripts seem to work on it.
I noticed that there is not test data containing a full Minion run. Could you please fix this?