Closed kuraga closed 8 years ago
@arqex did you classify this issue?
Hi @kuraga
This issue is still open and I would like to fix it. I have tried to do so a time ago, but I had no luck. I will leave it open to remind me.
Cheers
Hey @kuraga
How are things doing, still using freezer? This PR is difficult to solve, I haven't found a simple way of make that test pass.
Basically, we would need to not add the callback immediately on the on
method and wait for the next tick to add it. It generates a lot of complexity and I don't know if the issue worths the effort.
I'll close the PR, and come back to it if anybody complains about the same issue.
Cheers!
@arqex my library still uses Freezer but I don't use my library (cause left web programming for some time) :smile: .
But I don't agree with you about closing this issue. I think it's more important than some other opened issues. So I'll open an issue (instead off pull request). Feel free to close but I don't agree :smile:
@arqex P.S. Is getEventHub
just getEventListener
without store access? Or are there some other differences?
I think that set of triggers is determined before calling callbacks (in next animation frame) but not at calling
.set
.