Open lordofthejars opened 8 years ago
This issue might need first this fix if we want to support in-container too. https://github.com/arquillian/arquillian-cube/issues/231
Start with client side support. Then if we see a need for it, create an in container issue.
in CubeController or in DockerClient? I think best is CubeController.
The ContainerObject impl is in Core right? If in Core then CubeController.
No it is in Docker side.
El dj., 25 febr. 2016 a les 12:16, Aslak Knutsen (notifications@github.com) va escriure:
The ContainerObject impl is in Core right? If in Core then CubeController.
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/arquillian/arquillian-cube/issues/298#issuecomment-188735459 .
We should probably extract some of the Core features around ContainerObjects and move them to Core. That way we can just as well have OpenShift based ContainerObjects as Docker.
But we can expose this on DockerClient until that is done.
agreed
El dj., 25 febr. 2016 a les 12:28, Aslak Knutsen (notifications@github.com) va escriure:
We should probably extract some of the Core features around ContainerObjects and move them to Core. That way we can just as well have OpenShift based ContainerObjects as Docker.
But we can expose this on DockerClient until that is done.
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/arquillian/arquillian-cube/issues/298#issuecomment-188740877 .
Create DockerClient method for starting Container Objects, objects that are annotated with
@Cube
, programmatically. So you can do something like:It might be dockerClient or CubeController but provide some way to do it.