Closed spriadka closed 6 years ago
@MatousJobanek WDYT?
Hi @spriadka thanks for your contribution and sorry for my long inactivity - I was knocked out by flu in last 8 days. I'll do the review today.
Thanks for the feedback @MatousJobanek . Sorry for my long inactivity as well, I was not able to make until yesterday. I made some major changes e.g removed group imports, changed test logic, removed the CategorizedTestSelection
class etc. However, I would like to stand by the IncludingCategoryFilter
and ExcludingCategoryFilter
as it seems more elegant way than passing a boolean parameter into a method.
Short description of what this resolves:
This PR implements the possibility to manually exclude test classes/methods from execution based on their category (see #310 )
Changes proposed in this pull request:
excludedCategories
into thecategorized
configurationAbstractParser
logic to support this featureCategorizedTestSelection
which serves as an information holder to the categorized selection, which then transforms to theTestSelection
using thetoTestSelection()
method.Fixes #