I don't get it, shouldn't this need to exclude rules not strings? confused
It should support excluding both rules and strings/regexps. The latter is easier, which is why I went with that for now. We can add support for rules in a follow up PR.
I also really don't like the syntax
I'm not wedded to it. Feel free to suggest alternatives.
It should support excluding both rules and strings/regexps. The latter is easier, which is why I went with that for now. We can add support for rules in a follow up PR.
I'm not wedded to it. Feel free to suggest alternatives.