Closed shaohme closed 2 years ago
I don't think so. Provided it's compliant with the RFC, well written, has tests and won't break existing code.
How about this #44 ?
Sorry for the delay. I have some questions about it. I merged another PR that kind of conflicts.
It's okay. I'll look into it now.
Thanks.
Thanks.
It should be mergeable now
I would like to contribute a patch that expands the existing time.Time parsing in the library used for functions like GetStartAt, and GetAllDayStartAt, etc. At the moment these functions does not support timestamps and date strings like,
... and probably many others.
Would you reject a PR for such a feature?