Interpolation problems in `ShantellSans[BNCE,INFM,SPAC,wght].ttf`

[behdad]

Hello!

This is an automatically-generated report about possible interpolation problems in ShantellSans[BNCE,INFM,SPAC,wght].ttf, as found in the Google Fonts catalog.

The particular version of the font that was tested was archive:.

To download a PDF version of this report with helpful visuals of the problems, click here; Or to view it on the GitHub website, click here.

The report follows:

Glyph uni20A9.001 was not compatible:
  Masters: '', 'wght=800.0':
    Contour 3 start point differs: 0 in '', 6 in 'wght=800.0'; reversed: False
  Masters: 'BNCE=-100.0', 'BNCE=-100.0 wght=800.0':
    Contour 3 start point differs: 0 in 'BNCE=-100.0', 6 in 'BNCE=-100.0 wght=800.0'; reversed: False
  Masters: 'BNCE=100.0', 'BNCE=100.0 wght=800.0':
    Contour 3 start point differs: 0 in 'BNCE=100.0', 6 in 'BNCE=100.0 wght=800.0'; reversed: False
Glyph uni20B1 was not compatible:
  Masters: '', 'wght=800.0':
    Contour 3 start point differs: 0 in '', 6 in 'wght=800.0'; reversed: False
    Contour 4 start point differs: 0 in '', 8 in 'wght=800.0'; reversed: False
  Masters: 'BNCE=-100.0', 'BNCE=-100.0 wght=800.0':
    Contour 3 start point differs: 0 in 'BNCE=-100.0', 6 in 'BNCE=-100.0 wght=800.0'; reversed: False
    Contour 4 start point differs: 0 in 'BNCE=-100.0', 8 in 'BNCE=-100.0 wght=800.0'; reversed: False

This report was generated using the fonttools varLib.interpolatable tool. We understand that sometimes the tool generates false-positives. Particularly for more complicated font designs. If you did not find this report useful, please apologize and ignore & close it.

To give feedback about this report, please file an issue or open a discussion at fonttools.

[arrowtype]

Ah, yup, these two glyphs do have unintended interpolations. Thanks for flagging it!