Closed charreca closed 3 years ago
This comes from the --normalise parameter: a value of 200 will give you 200x in each direction.
We have determined that adding more depth does not improve the results.
Ok many thanks for your answer. Just one additional question: what is the minimum of depth in your pipeline to call a consensus? For the others Illumina approaches the thereshold is usually set at 10X. With ONT approach, is it higher to overcome the higher error rate of nanopore sequencing?
Caroline
Hi @charreca. Sorry for only having seen this now.
The consensus sequence will be masked with Ns wherever a position has <20X depth of coverage. We also mask out positions where called variants have failed to pass the variant filters. Hope this helps. We have recently updated our documentation to give more detail on the pipeline. Please open a new issue in https://github.com/artic-network/fieldbioinformatics if you have any further questions.
Hi! We currently use ARTIC bioinformatics workflow to analyze raw nanopore SARS-CoV2 reads. We achieve a maximum of 400x coverage across regions with no overlapping amplicons for each sample. Is it normal to obtain a similar result for each sample? Is there a limit of depth that we can change in the pipeline? artic_example.pdf
Thanks for your answer,
Caroline