artic-network / fieldbioinformatics

The ARTIC field bioinformatics pipeline
MIT License
110 stars 69 forks source link

SARS-CoV-2 workflow comparison - kindly check if your work is represented correctly #107

Closed thomasbtf closed 2 years ago

thomasbtf commented 2 years ago

Hello ARTIC Team,

I am from the University Hospital Essen, Germany, and we work extensively with SARS-CoV-2 in our research. We have also developed a SARS-CoV-2 workflow. In preparation for the publication of our workflow, we have looked at several other SARS-CoV-2 related workflows, including your work. We will present this review in the publication and want to ensure that your work is represented as accurately as possible.

Moreover, there is currently little to no current overview of SARS-CoV-2 related workflows. Therefore, we have decided to make the above comparison publicly available via this GitHub repository. It contains a table with an overview of the functions of different SARS-CoV-2 workflows and the tools used to implement these functions.

We would like to give you the opportunity to correct any misunderstandings on our side. Please take a moment to make sure we are not misrepresenting your work or leaving out important parts of it by taking a look at this overview table. If you feel that something is missing or misrepresented, please feel free to give us feedback by contributing directly to the repository.

Thank you very much!

cc @alethomas

BioWilko commented 2 years ago

Hi

A couple of notes:

thomasbtf commented 2 years ago

Hi Sam

thanks for checking! I've incorporated your suggestions in the table via https://github.com/IKIM-Essen/sars-cov-2-workflow-comparison/pull/15.

Have a nice day!

BioWilko commented 2 years ago

I just checked the PR and the column SARS-CoV-2 exclusive should be "No" but otherwise all fine :)