Closed vindarel closed 7 years ago
Does dexador work on ABCL, CLISP, SBCL, ECL (or a lisp in that family), and CCL? I try to ensure the libraries up on a-c-l are pretty cross-implementation?
Good point. I had to ask here: https://github.com/fukamachi/dexador/issues/27
Also note that drakma is stupid easy to use: http-request and, voila, a result. That is one reason why I dramatically like it. tbh I don't know how easy dexador is.
On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 3:13 PM, vindarel notifications@github.com wrote:
Good point. I had to ask here: fukamachi/dexador#27 https://github.com/fukamachi/dexador/issues/27
— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/pnathan/articulate-common-lisp/pull/58#issuecomment-270252719, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAuc4J_jlFKiCVC7Wsj1a-3jxbdNsHH-ks5rOtYwgaJpZM4LZEs7 .
Dexador is also this easy, besides this presentation is pretty convincing: http://www.slideshare.net/fukamachi/dexador-rises (tbh I barely tried Drakma, but I was beaten by many CL libraries with weird/old/unsufficient design…).
Hi, Fukamachi answered:
I tested it with SBCL, ABCL, ECL and CCL. Since Dexador uses usocket as its backend, I expect it's portable enough like Drakma.
Is that enough or I keep a reference to Drakma ? ("Dexador… that aims at replacing Drakma)
In this PR I suggest: