artithw / asterisk-cdr-viewer

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/asterisk-cdr-viewer
0 stars 0 forks source link

CID NAME doesn't show in reports #8

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Simulate a call into asterisk with CID NAME (e.g. "John Smith" <4145556666>
2. Check Reports and it will show 4145556666 but not John Smith
3. Checking /var/log/asterisk/full I can see "John Smith" and it's also in 
asteriskcdrdb in MySQL.

What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
CDR Report should view both CID Name and CLID for all Dahdi, SIP, IAX, and 
other technology trunks.

What version of the product are you using? On what operating system?
Latest

Please provide any additional information below.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by bruce....@sharpcall.ca on 11 Sep 2012 at 5:41

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Hi,

this field can be seen in the tooltip when you hover the cursor on the field 
SOURCE, see attachment.

Original comment by igor.oku...@gmail.com on 15 Sep 2012 at 10:30

Attachments:

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Thanks for the feedback.

That's display is a bit odd as for as the design and communication of the 
information goes. CID NAME is important because it tells you right away who the 
number belongs. For better display of info it's best to have that displayed 
just before the CID field. 

Instead "Userfield" can be sacrificed or "Account"...

Original comment by bruce....@sharpcall.ca on 15 Sep 2012 at 3:20

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
try to edit file include/config.inc.php and replace

$display_column['clid'] = 0;

to

$display_column['clid'] = 1;

Original comment by igor.oku...@gmail.com on 18 Sep 2012 at 7:05

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Amazing Igor. Please keep this as default in future release. I think this adds 
value.

Original comment by sharpc...@gmail.com on 18 Sep 2012 at 7:45

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Original comment by igor.oku...@gmail.com on 19 Sep 2012 at 6:15