Closed Giannis1993 closed 3 years ago
Took a quick look for now, I think it's OK to merge. There are, as you indicate, some duplicate pieces in the code and the convergence structure can be cleaned up I think. But, to not block your work, I would suggest to merge the current status and we can clean up those aspects later through future PRs.
Most of the plotting/examples can probably made more concise once we know which examples to show in the paper. When those are defined, we can just provide the examples that specifically show the results, so I suppose those files will all become a bit short, possibly with some more documentations etc.
Boys,
This PR includes 2 main upgrades:
I know it might be a lot to review, but I worked on them simultaneously, so sorry for that. I would suggest to merge into
dev
and then improve the features. You can use as an exampletruss2d.py
to check out the new features, as I have not edited the other files yet (e.g.mbb.py
) cuz the solver must be finalised first.One thing I already know needs some polishing is the repetitive code between
Plot2
andPlot3
classes, but I was unsure whether its preferable to haveifs
in the code to handle bothMixed
andnon-Mixed
sub-problems in a single class, or just handle them separately (as it is now). In any case, let me know what you think. @aatmdelissen @MaxvdKolk @artofscience