Currently ArtonomousArtPieceTokendepends on DNS for the metadata uri , which imo is at odds with the notion of being "self-sustaining", since DNS depends on someone maintaining backend infrastructure and creates the possibility of metadata being mutated after a token has been minted.
An alternative would be to store metadata in IPFS and use an ipfs uri, i.e. dweb:/ipfs/${hash}. Doing this would add overhead to piece creation but provides stronger guarantees around the decentralized nature of artonomous.
Currently
ArtonomousArtPieceToken
depends on DNS for the metadata uri , which imo is at odds with the notion of being "self-sustaining", since DNS depends on someone maintaining backend infrastructure and creates the possibility of metadata being mutated after a token has been minted.An alternative would be to store metadata in IPFS and use an ipfs uri, i.e.
dweb:/ipfs/${hash}
. Doing this would add overhead to piece creation but provides stronger guarantees around the decentralized nature of artonomous.Would love to hear your guys thoughts!