arttracks / elysa

CMOA Provenance entry tool
http://www.museumprovenance.com
14 stars 3 forks source link

New parties copying information from party above & duplicating parties in list #69

Open BergFulton opened 9 years ago

BergFulton commented 9 years ago

It seems like the issue is still happening. I tried to insert Wildenstein & Co. in to the parties list, added the name and then tabbed to add in extra information, and the location and footnotes from the Ludovisi family copied in to the Wildenstein fields. The "unnamed Family" also duplicated itself.

Screencap duplicating parties

workergnome commented 9 years ago

Pull and try again?

BergFulton commented 9 years ago

OK, pulled, I’ll try to re-do the Bernini since that seems to be today’s albatross. TBF

From: David Newbury [mailto:notifications@github.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2014 3:27 PM To: cmoa/elysa Cc: Berg-Fulton, Tracey Subject: Re: [elysa] New parties copying information from party above & duplicating parties in list (#69)

Pull and try again?

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/cmoa/elysa/issues/69#issuecomment-67994893.

The information contained in this message and/or attachments is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any system and destroy any copies. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender.

BergFulton commented 9 years ago

No go. Got to Wildenstein & Co and we started duplicating party names again and copying information from other records.

From: Berg-Fulton, Tracey Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2014 3:29 PM To: 'cmoa/elysa' Subject: RE: [elysa] New parties copying information from party above & duplicating parties in list (#69)

OK, pulled, I’ll try to re-do the Bernini since that seems to be today’s albatross. TBF

From: David Newbury [mailto:notifications@github.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2014 3:27 PM To: cmoa/elysa Cc: Berg-Fulton, Tracey Subject: Re: [elysa] New parties copying information from party above & duplicating parties in list (#69)

Pull and try again?

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/cmoa/elysa/issues/69#issuecomment-67994893.

The information contained in this message and/or attachments is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any system and destroy any copies. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender.

workergnome commented 9 years ago

Dog you pull both?

— David Newbury (773) 547-2272 david.newbury@gmail.com

On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 3:42 PM, Tracey Berg-Fulton notifications@github.com wrote:

No go. Got to Wildenstein & Co and we started duplicating party names again and copying information from other records. From: Berg-Fulton, Tracey Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2014 3:29 PM To: 'cmoa/elysa' Subject: RE: [elysa] New parties copying information from party above & duplicating parties in list (#69) OK, pulled, I’ll try to re-do the Bernini since that seems to be today’s albatross. TBF From: David Newbury [mailto:notifications@github.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2014 3:27 PM To: cmoa/elysa Cc: Berg-Fulton, Tracey Subject: Re: [elysa] New parties copying information from party above & duplicating parties in list (#69) Pull and try again? — Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/cmoa/elysa/issues/69#issuecomment-67994893.

The information contained in this message and/or attachments is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any system and destroy any copies. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender.

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/cmoa/elysa/issues/69#issuecomment-67996358

BergFulton commented 9 years ago

LOLOLOL. I didn’t have Walter pull it ;-).

But yeah, I pulled both. Provenance_tool had no updates when I did it before, and museum_provenance had changes.

TBF

From: David Newbury [mailto:notifications@github.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2014 4:00 PM To: cmoa/elysa Cc: Berg-Fulton, Tracey Subject: Re: [elysa] New parties copying information from party above & duplicating parties in list (#69)

Dog you pull both?

— David Newbury (773) 547-2272 david.newbury@gmail.commailto:david.newbury@gmail.com

On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 3:42 PM, Tracey Berg-Fulton notifications@github.com<mailto:notifications@github.com> wrote:

No go. Got to Wildenstein & Co and we started duplicating party names again and copying information from other records. From: Berg-Fulton, Tracey Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2014 3:29 PM To: 'cmoa/elysa' Subject: RE: [elysa] New parties copying information from party above & duplicating parties in list (#69) OK, pulled, I’ll try to re-do the Bernini since that seems to be today’s albatross. TBF From: David Newbury [mailto:notifications@github.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2014 3:27 PM To: cmoa/elysa Cc: Berg-Fulton, Tracey Subject: Re: [elysa] New parties copying information from party above & duplicating parties in list (#69) Pull and try again? — Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/cmoa/elysa/issues/69#issuecomment-67994893.

The information contained in this message and/or attachments is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any system and destroy any copies. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender.

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/cmoa/elysa/issues/69#issuecomment-67996358

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/cmoa/elysa/issues/69#issuecomment-67997935.

The information contained in this message and/or attachments is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any system and destroy any copies. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender.

BergFulton commented 9 years ago

PS- I can’t help but hear you saying this in Snoop Dogg’s voice. It’s kind of making my afternoon.

From: David Newbury [mailto:notifications@github.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2014 4:00 PM To: cmoa/elysa Cc: Berg-Fulton, Tracey Subject: Re: [elysa] New parties copying information from party above & duplicating parties in list (#69)

Dog you pull both?

— David Newbury (773) 547-2272 david.newbury@gmail.commailto:david.newbury@gmail.com

On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 3:42 PM, Tracey Berg-Fulton notifications@github.com<mailto:notifications@github.com> wrote:

No go. Got to Wildenstein & Co and we started duplicating party names again and copying information from other records. From: Berg-Fulton, Tracey Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2014 3:29 PM To: 'cmoa/elysa' Subject: RE: [elysa] New parties copying information from party above & duplicating parties in list (#69) OK, pulled, I’ll try to re-do the Bernini since that seems to be today’s albatross. TBF From: David Newbury [mailto:notifications@github.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2014 3:27 PM To: cmoa/elysa Cc: Berg-Fulton, Tracey Subject: Re: [elysa] New parties copying information from party above & duplicating parties in list (#69) Pull and try again? — Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/cmoa/elysa/issues/69#issuecomment-67994893.

The information contained in this message and/or attachments is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any system and destroy any copies. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender.

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/cmoa/elysa/issues/69#issuecomment-67996358

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/cmoa/elysa/issues/69#issuecomment-67997935.

The information contained in this message and/or attachments is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any system and destroy any copies. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender.