Open Ryton opened 11 months ago
Yes, that solved it.
RUN apk update && apk upgrade RUN apk add --no-cache sqlite-dev RUN apk add sqlite
That gives: sqlite3 --version 3.41.2 2023-03-22 11:56:21 0d1fc92f94cb6b76bffe3ec34d69cffde2924203304e8ffc4155597af0c191da (on a clean Alpine docker image)
(Haven't yet pulled Grafito / Arturo in there too), i assume its easier to add this at your end and push it again to dockerhub?
That's awesome! 🚀
The truth is I had left Grafito for a while (until different things had made some progress in Arturo itself) and I got back to it some 3 months ago. It should - mostly - be working, although I admit the margin for improvements is always... ample.
Ah... and why I'm saying all this? Because when "I got back to it", I completely forgot there was a Docker container as well! haha
Since you spotted it, you are absolutely welcome to make a PR yourself if you want, and I will happily merge it (and then update the whole thing @ DockerHub).
If not, I'll do it myself obviously. 😉
i'm not too familiar yet with a Dockerfile integration / Dockerhub uploading, as i mostly just dive in the docker commandline and save the image from there.
But that's not good practice => so this is a good opportunity to get to learn it. => so deal!
The caveat: needs to be quality-checked after!
Don't worry about it! I'm not a Docker guru myself either - far from it actually! :)
The main Dockerfile is here: https://github.com/arturo-lang/grafito/blob/main/Dockerfile. I think all you have to do is add the fix there... I think lol. Plus, you'll get the contribution credit you deserve! 😉
Regarding DockerHub, I'll take care of it.
Ok, this part is tackled at least :-) => will make a fork and PR.
$> print Versions
[engine:1.2.3 system:0.2.8 arturo:0.9.82]
$> print Grafito
[Version:0.2.8 Debug?:false verbose?:true caseSensitive?:true Palette:]
But I am(/we are) not out of the woods just yet, as the rest of (the latest?) grafito script doesn't work (anymore?/either?) in the docker at my end :( . Will try with an older release of Arturo and/or Grafito.
I'll have to test it myself as well and we'll see.
Sure thing is there were issues with the last official release (Arturo's I mean)... which have been fixed in the meantime.
So, the safest bet to see what works and what doesn't would be to use the latest Arturo version (@ master).
As far as I remember, Docker-aside, the two main branches - Arturo and Grafito - should be working together fine right now (at last!). But, let's see, let's see... 😄
We shall! 👍
Impressive work on both, either way. this is just a minor wrinkle that will be smoothed out (soon). Meanwhile i'll give latest/nightly + Grafito a try later today, good suggestion (though i think i tried that yesterday, and it froze). => but can always try again/dig down.
Could it be as simple as a missing bracket?
If i paste grafito.art in arturo (with trailing spaces), i get a missing ] error.
>> Syntax | missing closing square bracket:
] error | | near: [ | ^
We shall! 👍
Impressive work on both, either way. this is just a minor wrinkle that will be smoothed out (soon). Meanwhile i'll give latest/nightly + Grafito a try later today, good suggestion (though i think i tried that yesterday, and it froze). => but can always try again/dig down.
😄
Well... I guess the nature of the 2 projects (especially Arturo) is such that the "work in progress" stage is probably meant to remain there forever (and ever... lol).
That being said, I confess I already use Arturo in totally production-level code and so far I've had no real issues. Regarding Grafito, well, that was more like a (very) daring try at using Arturo for something practical - and combining my newly-discovered interest for graphs and graph databases (long story short: I played with Neo4J, loved it, then decided to load it up in a DigitalOcean droplet, realized that thing needed a... super-computer to say the least, and then I followed my normal way of thinking: why not try doing it from scratch myself?! haha)
P.S. You'll make me get back to Grafito seriously (again I mean!). And that's great! (if it weren't for some non-open-source related stuff I'm working on currently, I'd have more time, but what can I do about it...)
Could it be as simple as a missing bracket?
If i paste grafito.art in arturo (with trailing spaces), i get a missing ] error.
>> Syntax | missing closing square bracket:
]error | | near: [ | ^
Are you using the latest master-branch version of Arturo? (I'm asking so that I know what to test with... 😉 )
yes., using version v/0.9.83 b/889 for testing (own build on WSL2).
got the feeling it there is something weird with the brackets in graph. should the helperfunctions be sub-functions of this block?
Hmm... 🤔
I've just tried the examples/sample11.art
example and it seems to be working. (not with Docker, with the normal build)
A few notes:
arturo examples/sample11.art
This is what I'm looking at right now:
P.S. If you have something concrete you want me to try out, please let me know. For more... Windows-related questions, I think our Discord channel would be a better place for this type of issues, since there are far more knowledgeable people there (and rather active!) that could possibly address them! 😉
@drkameleon: you wrote: "That being said, you're more than welcome to post all issues you come across, related to... anything." =>Therefore ;-) : When i run "docker run -it arturolang/grafito" from windows 11 pro & docker commandline <docker run -it arturolang/grafito>, the container is fetched correctly and built, but when it starts grafito, i get the following response (right after the Grafito-logo):
`
Possible cause: Seems to me it is not assigning the engine field in the Versions dict correctly?
i assume the sqlite3 --version returns something faulty within the docker?
and indeed, from within arturo in the docker, i get this response: $> execute "sqlite3 --version" => /bin/sh: sqlite3: not found
Or extended: $> to :version first split.by:" " execute "sqlite3 --version"