As written, this merge request adds support for remaining simple DBus data-types, but only in some contexts. The problem with going all the way is due to Guile DBus not having a clear type definition for complex types, which I have started the discussion about over at https://github.com/artyom-poptsov/guile-dbus/issues/4.
As written, this merge request adds support for remaining simple DBus data-types, but only in some contexts. The problem with going all the way is due to Guile DBus not having a clear type definition for complex types, which I have started the discussion about over at https://github.com/artyom-poptsov/guile-dbus/issues/4.