Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
Thanks!
I think this is a render-layer problem - it is definitely something too
complicated to put in 019d (I think; I'm not completely sure..). We'll also
have to decide if we want to actually do something for this and what the layer
rules will be.
Original comment by buckyballreaction
on 19 Nov 2014 at 5:39
Original comment by buckyballreaction
on 24 Dec 2014 at 11:05
Let's look at this a bit closer to see if it can be fixed without a major
overhaul... if not, I agree, won't fix, but I think it may not be so difficult.
Original comment by watusim...@bitfighter.org
on 2 Jan 2015 at 6:36
It was easy... my mistake. Fixed in r0ef82895f62e
Original comment by buckyballreaction
on 3 Jan 2015 at 2:56
:-)
Original comment by watusim...@bitfighter.org
on 5 Jan 2015 at 7:11
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
amginea4...@gmail.com
on 19 Nov 2014 at 12:58