Closed canyon289 closed 5 years ago
I've created a PR proposing development rules for this repo. Once we decide on that, that next course of action for this PR will be more clear.
@ahartikainen asked somewhere if the ArviZ autocorr calculation was the same as the "manual" calculation in the docs. It is, here's some proof
arviz_autocorr = az.autocorr(mu_0.values)
np.isclose(arviz_autocorr, auto_corr, atol=.01)
Marked as Alpha and added todo note to add neffective. Resolved feedback for excess code output by semicolon or assigning vars were appropriate Merging due to the above
Per @ColCarroll's comments added an example of an autocorrelation plot that looks poor.
Have not included @ahartikainen's recommendation of interactivity or parts of a plot
Goal for this doc is to iterate a lot to get it to a high standard, then use this as the benchmark for the docs for the rest of the plots