Closed aloctavodia closed 7 months ago
Attention: 102 lines
in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.
Comparison is base (
e1a36c5
) 76.22% compared to head (eff66bd
) 65.65%.
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
Should we call this plot_trace_dist instead of plot_dens
me gusta mรกs con dist, si
Merging this. We can keep working on separate PRs, I will open issues.
This is my attempt to reproduce the legacy plot_trace.
we have ecdf too!
And also a lot of mistakes.
scale_fig_size
(needs more works). Is this the approach we are going to use for the new ArviZ?I added some logic to set the size of ticks, remove ticks and add x/y labels I am not sure I am doing the right thing, in particular for setting the size of ticks and remove ticks.
I did not add any code for bokeh...
Docstring and even variable names may need to be cleaned...
Should we call this plot_trace_dist instead of plot_dens?
To reduce redundancy and make the plots more compact, we may want to have a title per row with the variable names and spanning both columns. Not sure how easy is that
๐ Documentation preview ๐: https://arviz-plots--27.org.readthedocs.build/en/27/