Closed firestack closed 2 months ago
I ran CI in my repo and I believe I fixed the previous failure
Thanks!
Span
in a loop yourself, it's probably best to collect them into a container (Line
?) and use the normal printing functions to print that container.
- We would change the behavior for newlines to render them anywhere on the line, not just at the very end. This would handle callers passing multiple newline characters at the end of the line for whatever reason, or cases where newlines are not the selection boundary
One question, when would multiple newlines appear in a single line?.. A line, by definition, shouldn't contain multiple newlines, correct?
- We would change the behavior for newlines to render them anywhere on the line, not just at the very end. This would handle callers passing multiple newline characters at the end of the line for whatever reason, or cases where newlines are not the selection boundary
One question, when would multiple newlines appear in a single line?.. A line, by definition, shouldn't contain multiple newlines, correct?
The way I've tried implementing this doesn't actually care, so this will work out anyway if it does happen ππ»
I think I've got something that addresses feedback! Cleaning things up and then will push ππ»
I queued https://github.com/arxanas/scm-record/pull/46 for merge; you might have to rebase/update tests.
can you check
cargo clippy
andcargo test
and make sure they pass on each of the commits in the stack individually?
@arxanas Just ran both(at every commit in the stack, I wish JJ run worked lol), and didn't get any failures.
IIRC two of them should be squashed
I think it was handled in this? https://github.com/arxanas/scm-record/pull/37#discussion_r1641581903
This was the lint error I was talking about on the bottom of the stack:
Checking scm-record v0.3.0 (/Users/waleed/Workspace/scm-record)
error: method `draw_line` is never used
--> src/render.rs:527:12
|
368 | impl<'a, ComponentId: Clone + Debug + Eq + Hash> Viewport<'a, ComponentId> {
| -------------------------------------------------------------------------- method in this implementation
...
527 | pub fn draw_line(&mut self, x: isize, y: isize, line: &Line) -> Rect {
| ^^^^^^^^^
|
= note: `-D dead-code` implied by `-D warnings`
= help: to override `-D warnings` add `#[allow(dead_code)]`
error: could not compile `scm-record` (lib) due to 1 previous error
warning: build failed, waiting for other jobs to finish...
error: could not compile `scm-record` (lib test) due to 1 previous error
I squashed together the bottom two commits to fix this. Thanks for implementing this!
This was the lint error I was talking about on the bottom of the stack:
Checking scm-record v0.3.0 (/Users/waleed/Workspace/scm-record) error: method `draw_line` is never used --> src/render.rs:527:12 | 368 | impl<'a, ComponentId: Clone + Debug + Eq + Hash> Viewport<'a, ComponentId> { | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- method in this implementation ... 527 | pub fn draw_line(&mut self, x: isize, y: isize, line: &Line) -> Rect { | ^^^^^^^^^ | = note: `-D dead-code` implied by `-D warnings` = help: to override `-D warnings` add `#[allow(dead_code)]` error: could not compile `scm-record` (lib) due to 1 previous error warning: build failed, waiting for other jobs to finish... error: could not compile `scm-record` (lib test) due to 1 previous error
I squashed together the bottom two commits to fix this. Thanks for implementing this!
oh sorry! I swear I tried to find themπ ! I have a bunch of my own clippy lints in my global config which makes it hard to see these sometimes but I had sworn that it had no failures.
@firestack It's no trouble π. Can I interest you in git test
? π
This is my config for this project:
$ git test run -c help # HACK
The test command alias "help" was not defined.
To create it, run: git config branchless.test.alias.help <command>
Or use the -x/--exec flag instead to run a test command without first creating an alias.
These are the currently-configured command aliases:
β’ branchless.test.alias.lint = "cargo clippy --workspace --all-targets -- -D warnings"
β’ branchless.test.alias.fmt-fix = "cargo +nightly fmt --all"
β’ branchless.test.alias.test = "cargo nextest run --workspace --no-fail-fast"
$ git test run -c lint 'stack()'
...
which is how I checked for lint+test failures.
(Ideally, GitHub would just be better at doing stacked PRs, or make it easier to run actions on each commit in a PR, and we'd have CI per commit and it would be surfaced in a useful manner.)
This is a simple fix for #2 Rendering Tab Characters. I think this could be made smarter in the future (i.e., making the tab replacement characters configurable. Potentially getting the tab size from the terminal) but this fixes the immediate issue.
I added a stub of tests, but I'm not confident that I've done this correctly, so I figure we can chat about it.
I also noticed I could try doing this logic in
Viewport::draw_text
instead, but I wasn't sure if that'd be desired.Partially Addresses: #2