Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago
i'm on it-- have it repro'd
Original comment by adam.sah
on 14 May 2009 at 7:44
Karen-- so each listing has a different location, the current design
states that we dedup on date/time but not on location. Want to change
that? Michael had an interesting suggestion, which is merge listings
on "nearby" locations (algorithmically, fuzz-out the latlong, then
check for equality-- not perfect, but good enough + super easy)
Original comment by adam.sah
on 14 May 2009 at 8:28
Yikes, that's an ugly set of results.
It does seem correct to merge on location, in addition to date. The
"has_more_results" attribute will need to be renamed "has_more_dates".
You think this is low-risk to implement?
Original comment by paul.rademacher
on 14 May 2009 at 9:24
Good catch. In general, we should show city name and not just state. I
probably
would have caught this as not an exact dup.
If we fix this for Monday, would we suppress all the dups in the UI? I think
long-
term we might want to do something like web search, where you can click to see
similar results... (UI/functionality needs to be figured out)
Original comment by kar...@gmail.com
on 14 May 2009 at 9:25
yeah, given the complexity of this code, I think I'd rather punt until
immediately
post-launch. is that OK?
Michael and I attempted to do the websearch-style UI with "more..." in earlier
versions
which means that some of this code still exists, but also means that things are
messy
to change at the last minute.
Original comment by adam.sah
on 14 May 2009 at 9:32
feed removed from v1 launch
Original comment by adam.sah
on 28 May 2009 at 5:06
erring on the side of adding searchqual label (for searchqual prioritization)
Original comment by adam.sah
on 3 Jun 2009 at 9:54
feed re-added to launch, i.e. priority increased
Original comment by adam.sah
on 4 Jun 2009 at 1:13
Original comment by adam.sah
on 5 Jun 2009 at 2:45
these are still important, but moving out from 1.5 i.e. super nice to have
for 1.5 but not necessarily realistic
Original comment by adam.sah
on 11 Jun 2009 at 6:54
Original comment by adam.sah
on 28 Jun 2009 at 4:25
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
kar...@gmail.com
on 14 May 2009 at 7:06