Should not be necessary, because the framework should be standard agnostic. So it should be removed.
Additionally, no major thing, but when we touch the file.... this describes the result format, not the report format. So, the filename should be xqar_result_format.xqar.
Screenshots
Stumbled also over it, because the file type is more "xodr" than "odr". Anyway... should not be needed in the format and in the APIs.
Additional context
Probably the ReportGUI is evaluating this? Because there are two GUI elements for XODR and for XOSC. But this could be "workarounded" until the two GUI elements are replaced by one common (see #23).
This is also somehow related to the closed issues #9, and #10.
Describe the bug
When reading https://github.com/asam-ev/qc-baselib-py/blob/main/README.md#writing-a-result-for-checker-results, I noticed that there is the IMHO needless attribute "fileType" in "FileLocationType" in the result file format.
https://github.com/asam-ev/qc-framework/blob/a001d452a2af33009ac0713616abd8d5924dab68/doc/schema/xqar_report_format.xsd#L80
Expected behavior
Should not be necessary, because the framework should be standard agnostic. So it should be removed.
Additionally, no major thing, but when we touch the file.... this describes the result format, not the report format. So, the filename should be
xqar_result_format.xqar.Screenshots
Stumbled also over it, because the file type is more "xodr" than "odr". Anyway... should not be needed in the format and in the APIs.
Additional context
Probably the ReportGUI is evaluating this? Because there are two GUI elements for XODR and for XOSC. But this could be "workarounded" until the two GUI elements are replaced by one common (see #23).
This is also somehow related to the closed issues #9, and #10.