Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago
Good point. The original intent was to leave these members uninitialized so that
whoever is using the manager classes makes a conscious decision on the actual
implementations.
We should have set them in the sample classes though.
Not 100% sure that this is the right approach, but for now (revision 83) we
initialize all of them in the manager classes.
Original comment by mscurte...@pingidentity.com
on 6 Feb 2007 at 8:12
Original comment by marius.s...@gmail.com
on 6 Feb 2007 at 8:18
Thanks! Yeah, that's a good point. Ideally there should be some way to tell
people
to implement these themselves, although I don't think there is anything wrong
with a
reference implementation. Maybe consider moving the existing Managers into a
"sample" or "refimpl" package? Downside is that might make that packages
messier
than needed....
Original comment by sappenin
on 6 Feb 2007 at 8:59
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
sappenin
on 6 Feb 2007 at 3:14