I wrote up a whole issue with a reprex about not being able to reproduce the majority voting outcome from cvi_evaluators() and compare_clusters(), but just noticed that there's a sentence in Details of the cv_evaluators() help that says the output of CVIs are inverted for those where smaller is better.
I was primarily referring to the summaries of the CVIs in the help for cvi() while working, so I missed that note entirely. It would be helpful if that point were emphasize more strongly, or perhaps a message printed accompanying results. Getting inverted output is surprising behavior, in my opinion.
Thank you for all your work on this package! It has been otherwise very easy to use.
I wrote up a whole issue with a reprex about not being able to reproduce the majority voting outcome from
cvi_evaluators()
andcompare_clusters()
, but just noticed that there's a sentence in Details of thecv_evaluators()
help that says the output of CVIs are inverted for those where smaller is better.I was primarily referring to the summaries of the CVIs in the help for
cvi()
while working, so I missed that note entirely. It would be helpful if that point were emphasize more strongly, or perhaps a message printed accompanying results. Getting inverted output is surprising behavior, in my opinion.Thank you for all your work on this package! It has been otherwise very easy to use.