Closed nuest closed 9 years ago
Hi @nuest! We have a long-standing TODO to update licensing information on our repositories. Most are GPL but I can't give you a direct answer yet without some internal discussion over the correct one to use here. Will spur that discussion along and get back to you soon.
We generally test with a python client we developed, pyoos, but happy to see another client to try testing with.
We have a server with some datasets and the most recent release of ncSOS running, see the README: https://github.com/asascience-open/ncSOS#quick-links.
Close. Licensing issues are mostly answered above. We'll work to get better docs for clients on those repos see pyoos
"Mostly answered" licensing issues are unanswered, in my opinion, but I understand you have not finished the internal discussion yet. Imho there should be no grey areas or vagueness regarding the license, and as a developer I will not touch a repository that does not contain a LICENSE file and states the name of the license in the readme.
@nuest makes a good point about developers and their willingness to engage based on the presence/absence of clear licenses. @daf, if you can determine the conclusion your organization came to, I'll get in touch with Unidata and see if they have issues.
Is there an ncWMS repo? They have likely crossed this same bridge.
+1 for a MIT style licence. Was this funded entirely by NOAA? If so, the contract most likely dictates it be public domain.
:copyright: any updates on this?
Hi! Just came across your software, really cool! Just wondering if this is an open source project, I could not find license information anywhere.
What clients did you test yet? I'll take a look with mine as soon as I can: https://github.com/52North/sos4R/issues/24