Open joaocortes opened 3 years ago
Yes, it is by design. See ctwimac.tex and pdfctwimac.tex for details about \inx
, \fin
, and \con
. If you use ctwill +pdf
(and a TeX engine for PDF output), at least you should get "bookmarks" as a table-of-contents.
In fact, the ctwill
executable – just like its sibling cweave
– does create files jobname.idx
, jobname.scn
, and jobname.toc
(replace jobname
appropriately). It's just the TeX macros that are not elaborate enough to process these informations at this time. (Personally, I never came around to even learn the usage of ctwill-twinx
to generate a “master index” for ctwill.w
and common.w
.) Feel free to write extensions and submit a pull request.
Thanks. I got it after looking at the different definitions of those macros. When using ctwill
, \con
is never defined. It seems to be a strange choice. I can't think of any reason why ctwill
should have an harder time building the ToC. I will try to write an extension, as soon as I have time to do that.
You may want to look at CWEB 4.3 dev. The extended pdfctwimac.tex
already produces a table-of-contents
pdfwebtocfront.tex
Hi again. I am trying to get this solved. I looked into the current version ofpdfctwimac.tex
, and it seems it still does not produce a ToC. Did you reference the wrong branch on your last comment?
The current state of affairs is CWEB 4.9 dev and CWEBbin 4.9 dev. Table-of-Contents in CTWILL was not on the top of the list.
ctwill
does not produce a ToC, even with the option+x
. According to theman
documentation,Running
ctwill-twinx attempt.tex > index.tex
creates a master index, but there is no table of contents.Is this by design?