search

asciidoctor / asciidoctor-latex

:triangular_ruler: Add LaTeX features to AsciiDoc & convert AsciiDoc to LaTeX
http://asciidoctor.org
Other
111 stars 26 forks source link

`macros.tex` ignored when using HTML backend #44

Closed yacinehmito closed 8 years ago

yacinehmito commented 8 years ago

The README states:

The contents of a file named macros.tex will be read and used by asciidoctor-latex if it is in the same directory as the file being rendered. This is the case regardless of the output format -- HTML or tex.

However, it is not the case for the HTML format.

Tested with the versions 1.5.0.11.dev and 1.5.0.8.dev.

Steps to reproduce

Setup

Create a test.adoc file:

= Basic document

This is just to show that `macros.tex` isn't being used for the HTML output.

In the same directory, create a macros.tex file:

\dummymacro

Latex backend: no problem

Do:

asciidoctor-latex test.adoc

The command \dummymacro shows up in the preamble of test.tex, under the line %User defined macros.

Html backed: no macro

Do:

asciidoctor-latex -b html test.adoc

The string dummymacro in test.html is nowhere to be found.

jxxcarlson commented 8 years ago

Resolved by https://github.com/asciidoctor/asciidoctor-latex/commit/0b7cd88232df4c0ee3c03eccf032b410a203c9cf

yacinehmito commented 8 years ago

Thank you!

jxxcarlson commented 8 years ago

I updated the gem to account for #44. Please let me know if you encounter any problems with #44. The project as a whole needs quite a bit of work.

Jim

On Jun 27, 2016, at 9:47 PM, Yacine Hmito notifications@github.com wrote:

Thank you!

— You are receiving this because you modified the open/close state. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/asciidoctor/asciidoctor-latex/issues/44#issuecomment-228854186, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe/AApgNzKGbVgUJ_gY0swxNvRHjoiq1g9Lks5qQCi2gaJpZM4I_U-K.

yacinehmito commented 8 years ago

When using macros.tex I now encounter the following error:

asciidoctor: ERROR: test.adoc: line 1: only book doctypes can contain level 0 sections

This does not happen if there are no macros.tex file. This happens regardless of the backend used. This happens even when macros.tex is empty.

However this does not prevent the document from being properly processed.

yacinehmito commented 8 years ago

I think I found out why this happens.

The module lib/asciidoctor/latex/macro_insert.rb prepends a passthrough block to the document. But this block appears before the title, hence the error. This is without grave consequences for the HTML backend but it adds junks to the .tex file with the latex backend.

yacinehmito commented 8 years ago

Final words: By inspecting the commit 0b7cd88, I concluded that I missed the actually bug because of the omission of the undocumented include_macros attribute. By using it, it would have indeed added the div to the HTML backend, and only the HTML backend.

Two problems would be remaining:

. Macros would be included in the tex file regardless of the include_macros attribute . The innocent error message above would be printed when using the HTML backend

This is of course what would have happened if I used include_macros with a version prior to the 0b7cd88 commit.

In light of this, I think the final fix would be to directly inject the div into the HTML tree in place of the MacroInsert processor. I don't know if or how this is feasible though. I'll be happy to hack a solution if I ever find time to dig into it.

jxxcarlson commented 8 years ago

Very good analysis! I think your proposal is the right one. This probably requires a tree processor -- something I have not used yet. If you find a solution, please let me know. In the meantime, I will look into it also.

jxxcarlson commented 8 years ago

I'm going to try a different strategy by introducing a block macro that works like this:

include_latex::macros.tex[]

with the general form

include_latex::PATH_TO_MACRO_FILE[]

I should have this ready shortly. If it works, I will remove the automatic inclusion of macros.tex

jxxcarlson commented 8 years ago

I've made the following changes:

(1) Eliminate automatic inclusion of macros.tex if it is present. (2) Introduce the block macro include_latex_macros::LATEX_FILE, where LATEX_FILE is typically a LaTeX style or macro file, or a path thereto. For the HTML backend, the file is included in the source text as \( FILE CONTENTS \). For the tex backend it is included as-is.

If you find that this change works for you, you can close this issue. I very much appreciate your contributions to this project!

yacinehmito commented 8 years ago

Thank you, this makes me feel very welcome.

I like the solution as it can also serve a wider range of use-cases.

From the quick tests I did, this seems to work, although there still are some irrelevant warnings. I'll give you more details when I'll find how to use the development version on my main computer (I have some trouble with gem paths unrelated to asciidoctor-latex). I expect this to be solved in less than 24 hours. I'll close the issue if it is not done before.

yacinehmito commented 8 years ago

This works like a charm!

Note that, because macros are inserted in the text, you cannot use this new feature as a drop-in replacement for the macros.tex inclusion. Indeed macros were previously added in the preamble, which allowed the use of "preamble-only" macros (such as \DeclareMathOperator).

This is not a problem though. Such macros can be included with preamble.tex for the latex backend and docinfo.html for the html backend (macros included in the header work, at least on recent versions of Chromium).