Open jeffmaury opened 9 years ago
I understand the problem you are having but I don't see how it has anything to do with the Asciidoctor plugin. Are you suggesting a correlation, or have you filed the issue with the wrong project?
No, it is correlated as the ZIP file is produced by the asciidoctor zip mojo.
This is exactly why I didn't want to have one plugin do the work of many.
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 12:48 PM, Jeff MAURY notifications@github.com wrote:
No, it is correlated as the ZIP file is produced by the asciidoctor zip mojo.
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/asciidoctor/asciidoctor-maven-plugin/issues/145#issuecomment-69978991 .
Jason Porter http://en.gravatar.com/lightguardjp
Hahaha. I didn't even realize the Asciidoctor plugin produced a zip. Shouldn't that be handled by the assembly plugin (as I think Jason is suggesting)?
That was my take originally.
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 1:28 PM, Dan Allen notifications@github.com wrote:
Hahaha. I didn't even realize the Asciidoctor plugin produced a zip. Shouldn't that be handled by the assembly plugin (as I think Jason is suggesting)?
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/asciidoctor/asciidoctor-maven-plugin/issues/145#issuecomment-69985655 .
Jason Porter http://en.gravatar.com/lightguardjp
That was how I did a workaround for the problem (asciidoctor generating the HTML files and the assembly plugin buiding the Zip). But I wanted to signal the problem and get feedback to/from the community
I haven't heard of anyone else (besides the person who put it in) who was using it. I'm not even sure if it's documented (probably not as you hit this issue). I'm tempted to say let's deprecate it.
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 2:40 PM, Jeff MAURY notifications@github.com wrote:
That was how I did a workaround for the problem (asciidoctor generating the HTML files and the assembly plugin buiding the Zip). But I wanted to signal the problem and get feedback to/from the community
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/asciidoctor/asciidoctor-maven-plugin/issues/145#issuecomment-69997463 .
Jason Porter http://en.gravatar.com/lightguardjp
+1 for deprecation
I think the same, we should stick to what we do best. That's making awsome documents :+1: Currently we could set the Mojo as "unsuported" and remove it in some future versions.
There are some other gems in there that I think we should do the same. Like the server that's in there :)
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 2:54 PM, Abel Salgado Romero < notifications@github.com> wrote:
I think the same, we should stick to what we do best. That's making awsome documents [image: :+1:] Currently we could set the Mojo as "unsuported" and remove it in some future versions.
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/asciidoctor/asciidoctor-maven-plugin/issues/145#issuecomment-69999757 .
Jason Porter http://en.gravatar.com/lightguardjp
Sorry, Zip mojo is marked for removal at some point and no longer supported.
Hello,
I am facing the following issue: I'm building a ZIP file of HTML produced by the Zip mojo and it's working file. But this artifact is then used and unzipped by the assembly plugin. Then the content of the assembly is processed by another Maven plugin (IZpack). The problem I have is that the files extracted from the ZIP file have no read/write/execute flags set. I have looked at the ZIP file and the Host OS is set to FAT and it seems to be no attributes. I have this problem only on Linux not on Windows