Open mojavelinux opened 7 years ago
We already had this kind of conversation: it's the standard Atom's package naming.
https://atom.io/packages/search?q=preview
I prefer keep the current naming.
Basically what we're saying is that Atom is inconsistent...which is really no surprise given the lack of direction for the community.
What I'm most concerned about is new packages being introduced and not having any guidance within this organization. Perhaps we can try to reason about the logic so that we can establish a policy.
In order to have consistent package names in this organization, I think the package should be renamed to atom-preview-asciidoc. This name follows the pattern: atom-{primary-function}-{qualifier}, just like atom-language-asciidoc and atom-autocomplete-asciidoc.
(We could also go the other way and rename the language package). It's confusing to have different patterns for these two packages.