Closed vogella closed 8 years ago
Oddly enough, the gem name is "bundler" but the command name is "bundle". See https://rubygems.org/gems/bundle
I wounder now what I have installed with "gem install bundle" ;-)
Thanks for the feedback.
FYI "gem install bundle" seems to work fine and might be less confusing for none ruby people like me. Here is my installation output:
vogella@Frodo:~/git/docbookrx$ sudo gem install bundle [sudo] password for vogella: Fetching: bundler-1.11.2.gem (100%) Successfully installed bundler-1.11.2 Fetching: bundle-0.0.1.gem (100%) Successfully installed bundle-0.0.1 Parsing documentation for bundle-0.0.1 Installing ri documentation for bundle-0.0.1 Parsing documentation for bundler-1.11.2 Installing ri documentation for bundler-1.11.2 Done installing documentation for bundle, bundler after 4 seconds 2 gems installed
Please close PR if you prefer the current statement
We can add a note, but we shouldn't rely on the gem being there forever.
If you'd like, you change the sentence to:
Then, use the
bundle
command (which is provided by the bundler gem) to install the project dependencies:
That way we acknowledge the difference.
PR updated with your proposal.
Excellent! Thanks!
Thanks for your patience
Thank you for the suggestion. It's important to know how this information is perceived so that we can put the reader on a path to success!
I think the current "gem install bundler" is a typo