Closed jolyonb closed 4 years ago
I usually write it as d theta
But I agree it is not expected behavior.
Weirdly, dvartheta behaves as expected.
On Sat, 18 May 2019, Jolyon Bloomfield wrote:
Pretty much what it says in the title. Entering dtheta, which I expected would give me d\theta in LaTeX, instead gives dth\eta. Not sure why \eta has precedence over \theta in this situation!
I'm aware that I can instead write d{::}theta, but that shouldn't be necessary, right???
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.[AABTULG636WHV5EC37VNRGDPWDIZHA5CNFSM4HN3TXM2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFUVEXG43VMWVGG33NNVSW45C7NFSM4GUSBLOQ.gif]
That could just be operator precedence right? \eta
probably appears before \theta
. So you could probably fix this by changing the order of the operators in the source; but could that have any unintended consequences?
AsciiMath doesn't define or consider operator precedence. It parses a string from left to right, looking for the largest symbol.
For dtheta, it starts at the left and finds the symbol dt
. From there it parses the remaining heta
, doesn't find a symbol, so moves on and finds the symbol eta
. So your expression is actually parsing (correctly, based on the syntax) as dt h eta
.
As David Farmer noted, the correct way to prevent matching symbols you don't want is to add spacing, so d theta
works because it breaks apart the dt
symbol.
Ah, didn't realize there was a dt
symbol. That explains the behavior.
Pretty much what it says in the title. Entering
dtheta
, which I expected would give med\theta
in LaTeX, instead givesdth\eta
. Not sure why\eta
has precedence over\theta
in this situation!I'm aware that I can instead write
d{::}theta
, but that shouldn't be necessary, right???