Open barnabasJ opened 4 months ago
hm...is there perhaps a specific case where this doesn't work? I've added a test in ash_postgres
showing that its working.
Hmm, I will try and recreate it then. But I didn't have anything special configured on the relationship
On Wed, 22 May 2024, 23:22 Zach Daniel, @.***> wrote:
hm...is there perhaps a specific case where this doesn't work? I've added a test in ash_postgres showing that its working.
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/ash-project/ash/issues/1192#issuecomment-2125776421, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACZBCTOJAYSVIOOLITQ63LDZDUEB5AVCNFSM6AAAAABIDCJQDOVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDCMRVG43TMNBSGE . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: @.***>
It is possible (but unlikely) that something else I've done has fixed it also.
Describe the bug A clear and concise description of what the bug is.
I have this many_to_many definition
But the resulting SQL query for the join_relationship does not include the filter
To Reproduce A minimal set of resource definitions and calls that can reproduce the bug.
Expected behavior A clear and concise description of what you expected to happen.
It should add the filter to the SQL query for the join relationship
Runtime
Additional context Add any other context about the problem here.