Open cahartin opened 5 years ago
@ashiklom the zip file contains the Hector parameterizations for 6 CMIP6 models. cmip6_paramter_fits.csv.zip
What I think is interesting is that the S is not too high, because the CMIP6 models are reported to have a much higher S than CMIP5 I was expecting these values to be some what higher. It would interesting to compare with the reported CMIP6 S values, but I am not sure if we need that for the rcmip activities.
@ashiklom and @cahartin here are the comparison of Hector using the calibration results vs the ESM data, I think it looks like we got some decent fits they are off by a bit, @cahartin let me know if you think that I need to play around with the protocol a bit to get better fits.
CAN-ESM2 we are a tad offset on the temperature data.
I don't know your schedule but could you have some preliminary results but the first week of November?