Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
Good idea. A couple of points though.
1) Twitanalyst doesn't exist - do you mean twanalyst? If so, that site no
longer works.
2) Dabr is primarily a mobile service. Those services didn't run wonderfully on
my Nexus One (a fairly modern smartphone). Are there any mobile friendly
services we could use?
Thanks for the suggestion.
Original comment by terence.eden
on 4 Feb 2011 at 10:45
Twitanalyst may have existed when I raised this, in 2009 - I don't recall ;-)
I, and others I'm aware of, use Dabr as a desktop (as well as mobile) client.
Perhaps there could be a "desktop" mode, or such services could be made
optional?
There are many such sites, and at least some work well on my new HTC Desire
HD</brag>. However, I'll seek out more mobile-friendly equivalents.
Original comment by pigsotwing
on 4 Feb 2011 at 12:14
Here are a few more; I haven't yet analysed them for mobile-friendliness:
http://twitterholic.com/dabr/
http://twimages.org/dabr
http://tweetvalue.com/value.php?url=dabr
http://apps.asterisq.com/mentionmap/#user-dabr
http://twittercounter.com/dabr
Original comment by pigsotwing
on 4 Feb 2011 at 12:58
All are viewable on the Desire HD. YMMV!
Original comment by pigsotwing
on 4 Feb 2011 at 1:03
As a project used by many users, I don't see this feature getting into the core
code.
Original comment by david.carrington
on 4 Feb 2011 at 2:03
foller.me has an api and shows most popular mentions/keywords/hashtags/etc. all
those other sites are browser dependent and mostly only work well from a
desktop.
Original comment by ldoug...@gmail.com
on 13 Feb 2011 at 3:52
I dispute Comment 6#'s assertion that "all those other sites are browser
dependent and mostly only work well from a desktop" - they work for me on both
a Nokia N95 and/or an HTC Desire HD. Furthermore, as I have pointed out more
than once previously, I and others use Dabr on netbook/ laptop/ desktop
machines also.
Another site is: http://www.retweetrank.com/dabr/
Original comment by pigsotwing
on 10 Mar 2011 at 10:44
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
pigsotwing
on 21 Dec 2009 at 12:15