Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 8 years ago
Hi Justin,
I have begun working on this feature. Are you able to supply me with some
clarifications concerning what you are after because the example you provide of
GetRandom.Phrase(GetRandom.Int(10,70)) for your workaround does not achieve
what you have requested.
GetRandom.Int(10,70) will return an integer value between 10 and 70.. eg 20.
GetRandom.Phrase(20) will then return a phrase with a length between 0 and 20.
However, the enhancement you have requested is GetRandom.Phrase(int
minNumCharacters, maxNumOfCharacters). Can you please confirm that this is the
enhancement that you are wanting?
Thanks,
Joshua Roth
Original comment by joshuajr...@gmail.com
on 20 Sep 2010 at 9:23
Hello Joshua and thanks so much for looking into this suggestion.
>>However, the enhancement you have requested is GetRandom.Phrase(int
minNumCharacters, maxNumOfCharacters). Can you please confirm that this is the
enhancement that you are wanting?
That is correct.
Some example scenarios:-
1) var phrase1 = GetRandom.Phrase(1, 10);
// possible results.
a) "hs sdak we" // 10 chars - max result.
b) "s" // 1 char, min result.
c) "ajqufigff" // 9 chars - random result.
d) " " // 5 chars - random result.
2) var phrase2 = GetRandom.Phrase(10, 70);
// possible results.
a) "jdmn fwolg" // 10 chars. min result.
b_ "fjei ifjhs fjfjwjejefd dkfj pqm wj" // u get the idea..
NOW, sometimes we don't know what the min and max will be, so we randomize THAT
also :)
3) int min = GetRandom.Int(10,70); // returns 32.
int max = GetRandom.Int(min + 1, 100); // from 32 to some random number .. say 86.
var phrase = GetRandom.Phrase(min, max); // random number chars between 32 and 86.
This way, i feel that we're getting even more randomness .. but i don't think
people will really bother too much with suggestion #3 if they are using a large
min/max range.
Does this help / help answer the question?
-Justin-
Original comment by pure.kro...@gmail.com
on 21 Sep 2010 at 12:05
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
b8384...@klzlk.com
on 3 Sep 2010 at 1:10